Search
-
Recent Posts
- Overturning Sumptions 23/01/2021
- Whole-cost denialism – wilful blindness or myth? 21/01/2021
- Lockdown – a nationwide prospective study (update 2) 20/01/2021
- How Christ released Prometheus (but not like Adam did) 18/01/2021
- Why lockdown even matters 14/01/2021
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on Whole-cost denialism – wilful blindness or myth?
- Jon Garvey on Whole-cost denialism – wilful blindness or myth?
- Peter Hickman on Whole-cost denialism – wilful blindness or myth?
- Jon Garvey on Lockdown – a nationwide prospective study (update 2)
- Jon Garvey on Things in the news are not always as they seem…
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 02/01/2017
I fought the law – and the jury’s still out
In the last post I showed how “probablistic chance” fares no better than “Epicurean chance” as a true cause of physical events. Half of Monod’s materialistic “chance and necessity” explanation for evolution thereby falls to the ground. What is left is what appears to be the safer concept of nature obeying the “laws of nature” (ie the natural truths behind the formulations scientists make). This necessity, we assume, is a commonplace foundation of science which fits well into the theistic framework: God writes the laws of nature, and so achieves his purposes in the world.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
Leave a comment