Search
-
Recent Posts
- Opening the Overton windows of faith 19/04/2024
- Explaining megachurch scandals 09/04/2024
- Another song for you 07/04/2024
- The fashion for passion 05/04/2024
- A biblical view of gathered worship 04/04/2024
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Category Archives: Genealogical Adam
Toledot time
If you’ve spent any time with a Genesis commentary, you’ll know that the book is divided up by statements which have come to be called “toledot” statements. The majority opinion is that these link the compositional sections by introducing the next one with the name of a person from the last, using the formula, “These are the generations of…”
Posted in Creation, Genealogical Adam, Theology
6 Comments
Before the powers went bad
Daniel Deen (aka Philosurfer), over at Peaceful Science, has just reviewed a chapter by Brian Curry in the book Christ and the Created Order. The chapter is interesting in focusing on the role of the “powers” that are so prominent in New Testament teaching, but so completely absent from science-faith discussion generally.
Posted in Creation, Genealogical Adam, Theology, Theology of nature
2 Comments
Of real and allegorical kings
It seems to me that to those who see the Eden narrative as “allegorical,” that is denying an historical Adam of some sort, it is mainly a kind of mythic aetiological tale about the univerality of human sin. And so, if sin arose by some evolutionary process, or by a mini-fall in each self human life, it doesn’t much matter because evil’s present existence is real.
Posted in Adam, Genealogical Adam, Theology
Leave a comment
Intertextual Adam
I think one of the main reasons why the existence of an historical Adam and Eve is considered unimportant (or unlikely), at least by Christians who generally take the Bible seriously, is that references to Adam are apparently so sparse throughout Scripture.
Posted in Adam, Genealogical Adam, History, Theology
7 Comments
The noble savage
A guy called Jeremy Christian has posted his own view of “Adam and Eve and all that” on Peaceful Science, delighted to find something in Genealogical Adam that mirrored thoughts he’d been having for a long time. I’ve not interacted much with him there, but would like to discuss one area of agreement and disagreement in more depth here.
Posted in Adam, Creation, Genealogical Adam, Politics and sociology, Science, Theology
Leave a comment
The Indus Valley and randomness
YouTube, somehow tapping into my brainwaves, suggested this video to me, about the effort to interpret the alphabetic inscriptions of the Indus Valley civilization.
Posted in Creation, Genealogical Adam, Science, Theology
3 Comments
Another loose end on sequential Genesis 1-2
Does Genesis 2 follow on, or expand on, Genesis 1? I believe the former, and it was discussed a while ago at Peaceful Science, my own most recent argument being here.
Posted in Adam, Creation, Genealogical Adam, Theology
Leave a comment
What should Adam and Eve have done?
This is about “federal headship” and all that, though it raises interesting questions about biblical teaching on authority, accountability and so on.
Posted in Adam, Genealogical Adam, Theology
10 Comments
More possibly significant temple architecture
In the last post I laid out a case for a pervasive contrast between two kinds of temple architecture in Scripture, arising from what I take to be a deliberate contrast between the sacred space described in Genesis 1:1-2:3 and that of Genesis 2:4ff. Here’s a further example – a textual problem that, to me, makes most sense when seen as part of a deliberate set of contrasts.
Posted in Adam, Genealogical Adam, Theology
Leave a comment
Temple architecture and the sequence of Genesis 1 and 2.
This is a restatement, and reminder, of one of the significant internal reasons to regard the narrative of Genesis 1 and 2 as mainly sequential, rather than parallel – the significant changes in temple imagery between the two. It relates to my understanding of the Bible’s overarching metanarrative as Yaheweh’s desire to fill the whole cosmos with his glory, and to do it through his earthly creation, mankind. Since this is not necessarily a familiar view, I need to keep bringing it to attention. In so doing I’ll add some new thoughts, which I hope will clarify it.
Posted in Adam, Genealogical Adam, Theology
2 Comments