Search
-
Recent Posts
- I learn how to manipulate the masses (in 1963) 10/12/2019
- Murdering opinions 02/12/2019
- You can’t exclude human influence from science 27/11/2019
- “Alexa, what is the real cost of your switching on my lights?” 25/11/2019
- Press credibility 21/11/2019
Recent Comments
- Robert Byers on Murdering opinions
- Jon Garvey on Murdering opinions
- Robert Byers on Murdering opinions
- Jon Garvey on Murdering opinions
- Jon Garvey on You can’t exclude human influence from science
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 10/12/2013
The Incredible Hulk – a view from the 21st century
I find it fascinating how popular fiction unconsciously picks up the tenor of the times. The Incredible Hulk, though first appearing in 1962 and based, its creators say, on Frankenstein, Dr Jekyll and the Jewish Golem myth, embodies some popular science as well. In particular, as a textbook case of the cliché of “scientist transformed in laboratory accident,” he embodies the hopeful monster hypothesis of Richard Goldschmidt’s 1940 book. This in turn reflected the early optimism of the modern synthesis about the role of newly-discovered mutations in long-term evolution. But in fact it’s an anachronism – modern science explains the Hulk far better.
Posted in Creation, Science
74 Comments