Search
-
Recent Posts
- The blood is the life thereof 07/04/2025
- Tyndale House and me 05/04/2025
- To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved? 29/03/2025
- To Law or not to Law? 20/03/2025
- The tradition of magical thinking in Darwinism 15/03/2025
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved?
- Peter Hickman on To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved?
- Jon Garvey on To Law or not to Law?
- shopwindows on To Law or not to Law?
- shopwindows on To Law or not to Law?
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 24/10/2012
Incarnational model of Scripture
Why do I hate buzz-words so much? I think it’s because their use makes it hard to judge whether the use of the word actually stands up to scrutiny. So as soon as you speak of God’s making a free creation, you imply (or even trumpet) that disagreement means opting for a coerced creation. If that’s true for general vocabulary, it’s far more so for theological words. Tie your creation to the crucified God, and whether it is a legitimate concept or not you subtly suggest that anyone who disagrees devalues the death of the Lord Jesus. Peter Enns’ view of Scripture as “incarnational” is a case in point – … Continue reading
Posted in Creation, Theology
7 Comments