Search
-
Recent Posts
- The blood is the life thereof 07/04/2025
- Tyndale House and me 05/04/2025
- To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved? 29/03/2025
- To Law or not to Law? 20/03/2025
- The tradition of magical thinking in Darwinism 15/03/2025
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved?
- Peter Hickman on To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved?
- Jon Garvey on To Law or not to Law?
- shopwindows on To Law or not to Law?
- shopwindows on To Law or not to Law?
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 25/04/2012
Bibliolatry – what the Bible should have said
I was musing, not for the first time, upon how in the Science-Christianity debate, the first casualty is usually the authority of Scripture. That’s, perhaps, somewhat understandable from Catholic or Orthodox commentators, for whom the Bible has always shared its authority with tradition or the heirachy. But given that both in ID and TE discussions a majority of Christians appear to self-identify as Evangelicals, the emphasis on the human authorship of Scripture at the practical expense of divine authorship is surprising.
Posted in Theology
4 Comments