Search
-
Recent Posts
- Post-christians and post-post-christians 17/12/2025
- Strange bedfellows 07/12/2025
- The wrong kind of revival 02/12/2025
- Was Einstein wrong? 30/11/2025
- Experiencing God God’s way 28/11/2025
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 27/01/2013
Fearfully, wonderfully, selectively, neutrally…
It’s been pointed out that the concept of “Junk DNA” came not just from the observation of apparently non-coding genetic elements and their interpretation as “parasitic”, but from a theoretical prediction by the noted evolutionary biologist Susumu Ohno in 1972. Ohno said that in mammals, natural selection could only cope with a limited number of harmful mutations without being swamped, with deterioration and extinction as the result. He estimated that, given known rates of mutation, a maximum of 30,000 genes could be subject to selection. This makes intuitive sense – even under the best circumstances how could the environment select the best combination of hundreds of thousands of finely varying … Continue reading