Search
-
Recent Posts
- The blood is the life thereof 07/04/2025
- Tyndale House and me 05/04/2025
- To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved? 29/03/2025
- To Law or not to Law? 20/03/2025
- The tradition of magical thinking in Darwinism 15/03/2025
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved?
- Peter Hickman on To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved?
- Jon Garvey on To Law or not to Law?
- shopwindows on To Law or not to Law?
- shopwindows on To Law or not to Law?
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 27/01/2013
Fearfully, wonderfully, selectively, neutrally…
It’s been pointed out that the concept of “Junk DNA” came not just from the observation of apparently non-coding genetic elements and their interpretation as “parasitic”, but from a theoretical prediction by the noted evolutionary biologist Susumu Ohno in 1972. Ohno said that in mammals, natural selection could only cope with a limited number of harmful mutations without being swamped, with deterioration and extinction as the result. He estimated that, given known rates of mutation, a maximum of 30,000 genes could be subject to selection. This makes intuitive sense – even under the best circumstances how could the environment select the best combination of hundreds of thousands of finely varying … Continue reading