Search
-
Recent Posts
- Forever blowing bubbles 29/01/2026
- Equipping tomorrow’s spiritual warriors? 27/01/2026
- Theophanies and biblical theology 24/01/2026
- The Torah of Mati 19/01/2026
- Follow the anomalies 16/01/2026
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on Forever blowing bubbles
- Peter Hickman on Forever blowing bubbles
- Jon Garvey on Forever blowing bubbles
- Steve on Forever blowing bubbles
- Jon Garvey on Forever blowing bubbles
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 20/08/2013
More dissenters
If you look at the way the Wikipedia article on “Noncoding DNA” has settled after much to-ing and fro-ing after the ENCODE papers were published, you’ll see that the final “consensus” is that ENCODE’s figure of 80%+ function for DNA means little, since mere transcription is a poor indicator of function. Naughty ENCODE was careless in playing into the Creationists’ hands. Uncommon Descent has just pointed to a paper by Mattick and Dinger who clearly belong to that increasing “lunatic fringe” of people with excellent credentials who cast doubt on that wisdom.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
2 Comments