Search
-
Recent Posts
- Post-christians and post-post-christians 17/12/2025
- Strange bedfellows 07/12/2025
- The wrong kind of revival 02/12/2025
- Was Einstein wrong? 30/11/2025
- Experiencing God God’s way 28/11/2025
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 20/08/2013
More dissenters
If you look at the way the Wikipedia article on “Noncoding DNA” has settled after much to-ing and fro-ing after the ENCODE papers were published, you’ll see that the final “consensus” is that ENCODE’s figure of 80%+ function for DNA means little, since mere transcription is a poor indicator of function. Naughty ENCODE was careless in playing into the Creationists’ hands. Uncommon Descent has just pointed to a paper by Mattick and Dinger who clearly belong to that increasing “lunatic fringe” of people with excellent credentials who cast doubt on that wisdom.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
2 Comments