Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ideology is reliably replicable 07/11/2025
- My books on the cheap! 05/11/2025
- There are only two truths 03/11/2025
- Researching the rise of Pentecostalism in the UK 31/10/2025
- A time for everything 26/10/2025
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on Surreality and Messianism
- Levi on Surreality and Messianism
- Jon Garvey on A time for everything
- Jon Garvey on Hitting the Books
- Peter Hickman on Hitting the Books
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 20/08/2013
More dissenters
If you look at the way the Wikipedia article on “Noncoding DNA” has settled after much to-ing and fro-ing after the ENCODE papers were published, you’ll see that the final “consensus” is that ENCODE’s figure of 80%+ function for DNA means little, since mere transcription is a poor indicator of function. Naughty ENCODE was careless in playing into the Creationists’ hands. Uncommon Descent has just pointed to a paper by Mattick and Dinger who clearly belong to that increasing “lunatic fringe” of people with excellent credentials who cast doubt on that wisdom.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
2 Comments