Search
-
Recent Posts
- The blood is the life thereof 07/04/2025
- Tyndale House and me 05/04/2025
- To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved? 29/03/2025
- To Law or not to Law? 20/03/2025
- The tradition of magical thinking in Darwinism 15/03/2025
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved?
- Peter Hickman on To save Judaeo-Christian values, or to be saved?
- Jon Garvey on To Law or not to Law?
- shopwindows on To Law or not to Law?
- shopwindows on To Law or not to Law?
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 20/08/2013
More dissenters
If you look at the way the Wikipedia article on “Noncoding DNA” has settled after much to-ing and fro-ing after the ENCODE papers were published, you’ll see that the final “consensus” is that ENCODE’s figure of 80%+ function for DNA means little, since mere transcription is a poor indicator of function. Naughty ENCODE was careless in playing into the Creationists’ hands. Uncommon Descent has just pointed to a paper by Mattick and Dinger who clearly belong to that increasing “lunatic fringe” of people with excellent credentials who cast doubt on that wisdom.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
2 Comments