Search
-
Recent Posts
- Post-christians and post-post-christians 17/12/2025
- Strange bedfellows 07/12/2025
- The wrong kind of revival 02/12/2025
- Was Einstein wrong? 30/11/2025
- Experiencing God God’s way 28/11/2025
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 30/05/2017
Devolution revisited
The Intelligent Design biochemist Michael Behe not long ago critiqued laboratory evidence for evolution, based on instances of loss of function, as “devolution”, and as a result brought the disdain of many Evolutionary Creationists down on himself because, you see, “there is no such thing as devolution in science.” One poster at BioLogos escalated that by saying that nearly all ID scientists believe (equally stupidly) in devolution. We’ll pass by that entirely baseless hyperbole as typical of the man, but Behe did use the word, so let’s think about it.
Posted in Music, Politics and sociology, Science
Leave a comment