Tying a few (or a lot of) COVID loose ends

I’m reading Debbie Lerman’s The Deep State Goes Viral. It is deeply satisfying as it explains almost without remainder, with as much documentation as one is likely to get, all the nonsense of COVID, on which I wrote tens of thousands of frustrated words.

Essentially it confirms and documents the conclusion that I, and many others, have come to piecemeal to explain the abandonment of science and humanity over that nightmare period. And that conclusion is that the lab leak, probably in Wuhan, of a Western-designed chimaera coronavirus, was weaponised against the entire world, according to a pre-arranged programme, by a cabal of intelligence services, industrial players, international NGOs and other non-elected individuals.

Whether the leak was deliberate or accidental, or whether it originally came from a US rather than Chinese lab is largely irrelevant: the cabal had been planning such a biosecurity-based response for twenty years, and this was their opportunity. The ostensible motive, originally, was to plan an emergency response to hostile biological weapon attacks, although as all their proceedings were secretive, none of us knew about it. But seeing that that the first impetus, the “anthrax letters” sent after 9/11, was without doubt a security-led false flag, the real motives that became clear in 2020 should be preferred. These are simple: money and power.

The strategy of lock-down-until-vaccination, which is all it was, really, might make sense for a sudden bio-attack in a city. But as was clear even to me from the day after March 17th, 2020, when Boris Johnson changed tack from “Keep calm and take moderate precautions” to “Flatten the curve by imprisoning the nation,” it made no sense whatsoever for a purportedly zoonotic airborne virus already distributed globally.

But everything that followed – the ongoing lockdowns, the abuse of children and the elderly, the masks and plastic screens, the trashing of the economy, the censorship and misinformation, the misleading statistics, the useless mass-testing, the psy-ops. etc, etc – were designed solely to keep the population in a state of compliant panic until a hopeful technology, untried except to fail repeatedly, could be rolled out by complicit Big Pharma companies. It was never a Public Health response at all, but a Biosecurity experiment – or a putsch against the public.

As Lerman shows, this could only have been achieved through the untrammelled power of the rogue US intelligence complex, essentially at the head of the whole Western security system (Five Eyes, etc), which was in a position to bully or deceive client-governments, including their own, into going along with the programme.

In the US the most relevant agency was the National Security Council, which by mid-February 2020 had managed to elbow aside the Public Health structures, get its own apparatchik, Deborah Birx, into the leadership of the Task Force, and so control what passed for policy thereafter. Lerman references Scott Atlas’s first-hand account of the bizarre workings of that Task Force, explaining the dysfunctionality he could not comprehend by the fact it was merely the respectable face of a policy implemented by the NSC.

Only the power, and deep-state coordination, of the American Security State explains the lockstep U-turns in the policies of nations across the world within days of that takeover. To give just one example of the process, the whizz-kid mastermind behind Boris Johnson’s conservative government, Dominic Cummings, got repeated calls from “a network of Bill Gates-type people” saying how the smart guys must buck the old wisdom and spare no expense because not only were the coming mRNA vaccines the answer to life, the universe, and everything, but that (quote) “the actual expected return on this is so high that even if it does turn out to be all wasted billions, it is still a good gamble in the end.” They were right, of course, because the COVID response rapidly created the largest upwards flow of wealth in history, and the impoverished state of working people in both our Western nations and the poor south is the return for their involuntary investment.

The “Bill gates-type” network the easily-duped Cummings mentions also included Patrick Vallance, the UK Chief Scientist, and Jeremy Farrar of the Wellcome Trust. Both were in on the secret conference calls with Fauci, Francis Collins and the lead-players in gain-of-function research that engineered the cynical cover-up of the lab leak, both to cover their backs (and those of the whole cabal) and to push the profitable lockdown-until-jabs policy forward. Farrar now has a plum job at the WHO, and Baron Vallance of Balham hasn’t done badly out of the debacle either. Obfuscating the truth about the virus inevitably harmed research, as did censoring and bad-mouthing that research once it did occur.

Lerman suspects that the elected leaders were brought on board by telling them, in secrecy, about the lab-leak, exaggerating its risk, and reminding them of their commitments to NATO and their own nations’ secret participation in bioweapons research, which would not go down well with electorates if it got out. On the other hand, retired Prime Ministers can make a great living from heading up NGOs controlled by the cabal…

But as well as money, we are dealing with power, and we must remember just how quickly and in lockstep “Build Back Better” and “The Great Reset” became ubiquitous ideas coming from WEF leaders and Anglican bishops alike. Digital Identity had always been part of the Biosecurity plan for the world going forward, and the humming and harring over vaccine passports by governments must be seen in this light, as I observed here at the time. When it became obvious that mRNA vaccines didn’t stop spread the project failed in the UK, but vaccine passports are far from dead in the EU and elsewhere, and are still pushed by the WHO that is being granted new powers to formulate pandemic policies internationally.


Overall then, the book is well worth getting to understand what happened, and why, during COVID, but more still as a warning that despite the Trump attempt to uproot the Deep State, we are not out of the woods. I’m two thirds of the way through Lerman’s book, but one of the more chilling things came quite near the beginning, on page 81. Remember how it was the US National Security Council that, without any obvious justification and without telling anyone, actually took charge of the COVID response and ruined our economies, damaged our children, killed millions across the world by promoting toxic medications and banning safe ones, and lost us so many civil liberties?

Well, before March 2020 the NSC website stated its remit as “national security and foreign policy matters,” which seems sensible for a top-level intelligence outfit. But by 2024, under the Biden government (and it’s worth mentioning that Lerman’s evidence reveals that the cabal delayed the announcement of a “successful” vaccine until after the 2020 election, lest Trump get the credit), the NSC website was advocating a “new and broader understanding of national security.” They now include “homeland security, global public health, international economics, climate, science and technology, cybersecurity, migration, and others” in their concerns. By which one might conclude that they’re happy to work behind the scenes to implement secret policies on these things for everyone in the world, as they did for COVID.

So might overseeing “homeland security” possibly cover the strange Islamification of our nations? “Global public health” a few more deliberate pandemics like bird flu? “International economics” the imminent collapse of the fiat currencies? “Climate” simply alarmist propaganda and unworkable Net Zero? “Science and technology” energy-intensive AI to optimise surveillance and information control? “Cybersecurity” a few well-placed grid failures or the paralysis of the banking system? “Migration” the mass-replacement of our populations through deliberately uncontrolled borders?

I’m only asking for a friend.

Avatar photo

About Jon Garvey

Training in medicine (which was my career), social psychology and theology. Interests in most things, but especially the science-faith interface. The rest of my time, though, is spent writing, playing and recording music.
This entry was posted in History, Politics and sociology. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply