Search
-
Recent Posts
- Simon Magus, crooked cult leaders, and kundalini energy 17/11/2025
- Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium) 14/11/2025
- Innovation is not restoration 09/11/2025
- Ideology is reliably replicable 07/11/2025
- My books on the cheap! 05/11/2025
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium)
- Peter Hickman on Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium)
- Jon Garvey on Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium)
- Peter Hickman on Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium)
- Jon Garvey on Surreality and Messianism
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 07/09/2012
Two and a half phases of theistic evolution #2
In my last post I showed how, to the theistic evolutionists of his time, Darwin’s original theory was capable of delivering, without God’s direct intervention, all that the Biblical doctrine of creation described (with the exception, mainly, of mankind’s spiritual qualities). To people like B B Warfield, then, evolution was a true efficient cause, for which God as the original Creator was the primary cause. But then the theory changed.