Search
-
Recent Posts
- Immanence narratives for the post-secular age 03/01/2026
- Pentecostalism’s low view of the Holy Spirit 31/12/2025
- A personal example of error disguised by truth 29/12/2025
- And talking of le meme chose… 27/12/2025
- C’est chaque fois la même chose 26/12/2025
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 01/06/2016
Laws, damned laws, and statistics
One key part of the argument John Wesley brings for there being particular providence (see previous post), as against only general providence, is that the latter necessarily consists of the sum of the former: You say, “You allow a general providence, but deny a particular one.” And what is a general, of whatever kind it be, that includes no particulars? Is not every general necessarily made up of its several particulars?
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
2 Comments