Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Church and (spiritually) radical politics 06/05/2024
- Why “Charismatic” always tends to become “Hypercharismatic” 01/05/2024
- Passion, addiction, dealers, disappointment 29/04/2024
- God’s agenda – revival or survival (2)? 26/04/2024
- God’s agenda – revival or survival (1)? 24/04/2024
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 09/09/2016
How regular is normal?
Tom Gilson runs the excellent Thinking Christian blog, but has also made a useful contribution to the recent debate over methodological naturalism. In 2011 he did a multi-part series here on why science neither needs, nor benefits from, MN, and came to the positive point with his alternative here. In the main, he favours a change of nomenclature rather than of practice, because of the ease with which MN, originally coined by a Christian (and not many decades ago, at that) to distinguish it from metaphysical naturalism, has actually become a potent means of endorsing the mythical link between science and atheism.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
Leave a comment