Search
-
Recent Posts
- British values were Evangelical Christian values 30/05/2026
- Donald Campbell and Darwinian theory 28/05/2026
- Speech suppression more contagious than COVID – and certainly deadlier 26/05/2026
- Nudging society to destruction 20/05/2026
- Unite the Kingdom May 16 17/05/2026
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on Speech suppression more contagious than COVID – and certainly deadlier
- Peter Hickman on Speech suppression more contagious than COVID – and certainly deadlier
- Jon Garvey on Nudging society to destruction
- Jon Garvey on Unite the Kingdom May 16
- Jon Garvey on We meet the Word in the word, not in the world
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 09/09/2016
How regular is normal?
Tom Gilson runs the excellent Thinking Christian blog, but has also made a useful contribution to the recent debate over methodological naturalism. In 2011 he did a multi-part series here on why science neither needs, nor benefits from, MN, and came to the positive point with his alternative here. In the main, he favours a change of nomenclature rather than of practice, because of the ease with which MN, originally coined by a Christian (and not many decades ago, at that) to distinguish it from metaphysical naturalism, has actually become a potent means of endorsing the mythical link between science and atheism.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
Leave a comment