Search
-
Recent Posts
- Immense and eternal, not big and old 19/08/2026
- Cambridge professors and Evangelical beliefs 13/08/2026
- Dickens ex machina 07/08/2026
- Rehashing double causation 06/08/2026
- The extended God hypothesis 01/08/2026
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 09/09/2016
How regular is normal?
Tom Gilson runs the excellent Thinking Christian blog, but has also made a useful contribution to the recent debate over methodological naturalism. In 2011 he did a multi-part series here on why science neither needs, nor benefits from, MN, and came to the positive point with his alternative here. In the main, he favours a change of nomenclature rather than of practice, because of the ease with which MN, originally coined by a Christian (and not many decades ago, at that) to distinguish it from metaphysical naturalism, has actually become a potent means of endorsing the mythical link between science and atheism.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
Leave a comment