Search
-
Recent Posts
- RIP Günter Bechly 09/01/2025
- What the Bible should have said #28 04/01/2025
- Religion without a covenant 02/01/2025
- Ox and ass before him bow… 26/12/2024
- The DNA of the babe in the stable 24/12/2024
Recent Comments
- Robert Byers on RIP Günter Bechly
- Jon Garvey on Socialism = monopolist corporatism
- shopwindows on Socialism = monopolist corporatism
- Jon Garvey on Religion without a covenant
- Ben on Religion without a covenant
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 11/05/2012
On philosophy of science and religion
One reason I have for being suspicious of current evolutionary theory is a generic one. The theory was conceived and pursued with materialist assumptions. If those assumptions are wrong, then it’s inconceivable that the details of the theory would remain unchanged. No outsider could say where such changes were needed – it’s a job for the specialists in each field. It’s like the conversion of an unbeliever to Christianity: the change is bound to affect beliefs and practices in relation to work, to relationships and to use of resources. If not, nothing really happened. Assumptions, in other words, always affect outcomes.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
3 Comments