Search
-
Recent Posts
- Simon Magus, crooked cult leaders, and kundalini energy 17/11/2025
- Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium) 14/11/2025
- Innovation is not restoration 09/11/2025
- Ideology is reliably replicable 07/11/2025
- My books on the cheap! 05/11/2025
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium)
- Peter Hickman on Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium)
- Jon Garvey on Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium)
- Peter Hickman on Why I am an amillenialist (pending the millennium)
- Jon Garvey on Surreality and Messianism
Post Archive
Daily Archives: 21/10/2016
A theological lens on “random with respect to fitness”
In the last few posts, I’ve been trying to point out the epistemological limits of science (and how they are routinely transgressed). In particular, I’ve tried to show how “contingency” and “randomness” are, in effect, epistemological black boxes in science. To say something is random, in science, should mean nothing more than “we do not fully understand the causes, and cannot predict the effects.”
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology
12 Comments