Search
-
Recent Posts
- Before knowing your enemy recognise his enmity 19/03/2026
- Christendom has its advantages 14/03/2026
- The many-faceted Israel (2) 08/03/2026
- The many-faceted Israel (1) 06/03/2026
- Christian Replacement Zionism (or something) 03/03/2026
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Category Archives: Science
Hump retrospective 3: creation with no need for a Creator
In Britain, at least, a common position of many ordinary Evangelical Christians (until they start reading American books, anyway!) is, “I don’t see why God couldn’t have created through evolution.” The rub is that they usually have little idea of what evolutionary theory says: what they mean is that species might well change over long periods of times, under the creative direction of God, as an alternative to each being created de novo.
Posted in Creation, Hump Retrospective, Science, Theology, Theology of nature
Leave a comment
Hump retrospective 2: old earth with death, carnivores and natural evils
Creation “groaning” for 13bn years? My retrospective review of this aspect of the last ten years of my research is timely, it seems. For reviewing Joshua Swamidass’s Genealogical Adam and Eve YECs Robert Carter and John Sanford mention Josh’s citing of my book God’s Good Earth, in relation to the subject of death before the Fall.
Posted in Creation, Hump Retrospective, Science, Theology, Theology of nature
2 Comments
Hump retrospective 1: six day recent creation
It was what I fielded about the biblical acceptability of an old earth view that got me “censored” in the original series of articles for a Christian magazine in 2008 (see previous column) that put me on to the science-faith trail.
Posted in Creation, Hump Retrospective, Science, Theology, Theology of nature
Leave a comment
A retrospective on my last decade’s work
I thought it would be worth spending a few posts looking back on what has turned out to be a fruitful “research programme” on scientific and biblical origins over the last ten years for me, to see what problems have been resolved, and which, if any, remain unanswered.
Posted in Creation, Hump Retrospective, Science, Theology, Theology of nature
53 Comments
Continuity and discontinuity
Here’s an interesting podcast by Intelligent Design proponent Paul Nelson, a philosopher of science, whom I’ve got to know a little both through Peaceful Science and via a mutual friend.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology of nature
Leave a comment
Are research paradigms faith commitments?
When I was about five, I joined the TV comic’s Red Ray Club, whose badge was proudly preserved in the family until my brother wisely threw it out of his home a year or two ago.
Posted in Genealogical Adam, Philosophy, Science, Theology
2 Comments
Cutting edge science and witch trials
Using the Salem witch trials as an analogy in my last post made me aware of the controversial figure of Cotton Mather, the archetypal superstitious Puritan widely blamed for the Salem witch trials.
Posted in History, Politics and sociology, Science
Leave a comment
Intersectional shamanism
Three cheers for actor Laurence Fox, who on the BBC’s Question Time refused point blank to acknowledge the very validity of the existence of the “unconscious institutional racism” of the British people voiced by a (white) audience member regarding the Artist Formerly Known as HRH.
Posted in History, Politics and sociology, Science
3 Comments
Death before the Fall
Three times in the last week, I’ve encountered YEC objections to old-earth thinking in general, and Genealogical Adam and Eve in particular, that stress the theological importance of the direct relationship between sin and death. One of these was in one of the few negative comments on Josh Swamidass’s YouTube interview (a good watch), one was from a scholar into whose correspondence I was copied, and one was from another Christian academic in a video on another topic.
Posted in Creation, Genealogical Adam, Science, Theology of nature
2 Comments
You can’t judge a book…
…by looking at the cover But you can at least try. The publisher sent me the proposed cover design for my forthcoming book before the weekend, which delighted me as it matches exactly what I had in mind (so it’s entirely my fault if it’s rubbish!).
Posted in Genealogical Adam, Science, Theology
Leave a comment