I’m slowly wading through Russell’s Cosmology – From Alpha to Omega, in which, amongst other things, he covers his “quantum indeterminacy” hypothesis for NIODA (non-interventive objective divine action), as advertised in Ted Davis’ blogs at BioLogos. If I have a criticism overall, it’s that he seems to be playing a game that accepts science’s assertions about nature’s being (at the Newtonian level) a closed system. This being assumed, he seems to say, how can we assert God’s activity in the world without his interfering with natural law, which science won’t allow. To me, the obvious first move is to question whether there is adequate evidence for science’s deterministic assertion in the first place.
Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Reich Stuff 05/09/2026
- Sideways with the people! 03/09/2026
- The psychology of materialism 27/08/2026
- Immense and eternal, not big and old 19/08/2026
- Cambridge professors and Evangelical beliefs 13/08/2026
Recent Comments
Post Archive