Search
-
Recent Posts
- Immense and eternal, not big and old 19/08/2026
- Cambridge professors and Evangelical beliefs 13/08/2026
- Dickens ex machina 07/08/2026
- Rehashing double causation 06/08/2026
- The extended God hypothesis 01/08/2026
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Monthly Archives: August 2026
Immense and eternal, not big and old
“Am I only a God nearby,”declares the Lord,“and not a God far away?Who can hide in secret placesso that I cannot see them?”declares the Lord.“Do not I fill heaven and earth?”declares the Lord. (Jeremiah 23:23-4).
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology, Theology of nature, Uncategorized
4 Comments
Cambridge professors and Evangelical beliefs
How do you complete a close study of the Book of Acts, and conclude that it teaches that miracles are to be expected routinely (though they “sometimes” don’t occur) without noticing that the book specifically attributes miracles only to “the apostles,” and overwhelmingly to Peter and Paul?
Posted in Politics and sociology, Theology
Leave a comment
Dickens ex machina
I’ve had some further thoughts prompted by my use, in my last post, of Charles Dickens as the quasi-deity creating the world of Oliver Twist. One of the weaknesses of Dickens as a writer, especially in his earlier books, is his use of unlikely coincidence, or deus ex machina, in resolving his plots. It’s not uncommon for his characters to be rescued from difficult situations by bumping into people who happen to have been friends in far-off places and times.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Theology, Theology of nature
Leave a comment
Rehashing double causation
One of the problems atheists have with theism is the doctrine of double causation. This is usually demonstrated by their belief that finding efficient causes in nature excludes the need for God. Whilst they may find pause for reflection in the Big Bang, every other reference to God in the world is taken to be “the God of the Gaps.”
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Theology
Leave a comment
The extended God hypothesis
I’m reading Steve Meyer’s Return of the God Hypothesis as part of a self-imposed refresher course on science-faith matters. My reading follows directly on from another fairly lengthy book on cosmological fine-tuning, A Fortunate Universe, by Lewis and Barnes.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology of nature
Leave a comment