Yesterday I critiqued Bret Weinstein’s proposed rapprochement of “science” with Christian morality, pointing out that he misunderstood the foundations of Christianity, and merely tried to replace them with an inferior, naturalistic evolutionary, narrative. In fact the problem is worse than that, because it’s not simply that his proposal hides the shaky metaphysical foundations of naturalism, but that even in materialist terms it is pseudoscientific. And that is because societal morals are demonstrably non-evolutionary. As I will now demonstrate.
Continue readingSearch
-
Recent Posts
- More on Bret Weinstein’s evolutionary distorting mirror 08/12/2023
- Bret Weinstein’s evolutionary mirror 07/12/2023
- Unconstitutional monarchy 02/12/2023
- One of my occasional posts on occasionalism 27/11/2023
- Bad theology exposed in the tabloids 24/11/2023
Recent Comments
Post Archive