The old critical scholars, back in the days when there was a liberal source-critical consensus, used to say that Genesis contains two incompatible creation stories, the first from the “E” source and the second, the Eden narrative, from “J.” Or at least that was the gist, as many scholars seemed to assign odd verses to a different source at a whim. But they had a point: if Moses wrote Genesis, or the bulk of it, and Genesis 2 is a re-focused view of the creation, then he left in some inconsistencies at a rather fundamental level, beyond merely a shift of imagery.
Continue readingSearch
-
Recent Posts
- Follow the anomalies 16/01/2026
- Signs of life? 14/01/2026
- The same old schtick, Shift. 12/01/2026
- Frying pans and fires? 09/01/2026
- Immanence narratives for the post-secular age 03/01/2026
Recent Comments
Post Archive