Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ideology as brain surgery 06/06/2026
- What turns Evangelicals Catholic? 03/06/2026
- British values were Evangelical Christian values 30/05/2026
- Donald Campbell and Darwinian theory 28/05/2026
- Speech suppression more contagious than COVID – and certainly deadlier 26/05/2026
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Author Archives: Jon Garvey
SARS-CoV2 – Evolution or Intelligent Design?
There’s a rather significant article on medium.com summarising the evidence on SARS-CoV2 origins here, by Nicholas Wade. It’s around 11,000 words, but you guys don’t come here for sound-bites, after all!
Posted in Medicine, Politics and sociology, Science
2 Comments
Gags, jabs and rags
This is just another miscellany of current COVID madness, with some explanation of why it is planned to continue indefinitely.
Posted in Music, Politics and sociology, Science
Leave a comment
Being on the safe side
We now know a lot more about COVID than we did last year, which makes it easier to follow the science in health policy, as our government is doing with the help of the country’s leading behavioural psychologists and theoretical modellers. Well, mainly political analysts, actually, guessing what will make them look least like idiots for ruining the economy.
Posted in Medicine, Politics and sociology, Science
1 Comment
Evolutionary theology
An essay of mine has just been published at Sapientia as part of a symposium in response to John Schneider’s Animal Suffering and the Darwinian Problem of Evil, overseen by Kevin Vanhoozer.
Posted in Creation, History, Philosophy, Science, Theology of nature
Leave a comment
Is prayer a conversation?
One of Evangelicalism’s “distinctives” is its stress on a “personal relationship” with God, which properly implies various theological ideas of particular election, individual grace, and personal commitment, combined with a belief in the active ministry of the Holy Spirit and special providence in the believer’s life. In other words, it contrasts with purely formal, intellectual or ritual concepts of membership of the Church.
Posted in Theology
Leave a comment
Environmental costs of worldly virtue
Now, my problem is that if somebody talks about a sure-fire and simple way of saving the environment, I’ll immediately ask how it works (in detail), what the down-sides are and, of course, the rather obvious one of whether it even works behind the green hype. For some reason, that seems to be an uncommon thing to do, even for governments.
Posted in Politics and sociology, Science
1 Comment
Virtue, virtue everywhere…
Last month the now mandatory alumni magazine arrived from my wife’s old college. The usual requests for money were inside, but the cover sported a photo of an athletic-looking black chap in rugby strip standing in front of the familiar architecture.
Posted in Philosophy, Politics and sociology, Theology
Leave a comment
We were right about false positives
The current “false positive” discussion that’s reached the MSM is about the lateral flow tests prodigally doled out at supermarkets for the worried public to bodge at home, and how many people will be quarantined unnecessarily for every true positive case. It goes along with the statistic that routine and invasive testing of school children, not at any risk from COVID, costs £120,000 to find one case (and that is probably a false positive too). That many were warning the government of this last year does their policymaking no credit at all.
Posted in Medicine, Politics and sociology, Science
Leave a comment
Spot the correlation
Just a short piece with a second-hand chart, which is instructive if you haven’t seen it. It shows the COVID death rates across the US states:
Posted in Medicine, Politics and sociology, Science
Leave a comment
Do not be deceived
There’s a rather nice little piece in Watts Up With That today. It contrasts real science, based on accumulating evidence, with”Woke Science”: In woke “science” there is no falsifiable hypothesis. In place of that, we have the official orthodox consensus view. The official orthodox consensus view has been arrived at by all the smartest people, because it just seems like it must be right. The official orthodox consensus view must not be contradicted, particularly by the little people like you. Based on the official orthodox consensus view, those in power can take away all your freedom (Covid) and/or transform the entire economy (climate). After all, it’s the “science.”
Posted in Medicine, Politics and sociology, Science
1 Comment