On BioLogos I was challenged yesterday to describe in strictly biological
terms how new information got into lifeforms during the Cambrian. There seems no particularly apposite reason for this personal challenge, apart from the inference that I have apparently “outed” myself as a doctrinaire IDist by buying a book by an ID author (as did several BioLogos writers in reviewing Stephen Meyer’s book, of course). But who knows the real reason? People committed to identifying one with some stereotype are to the academic study of ideologies what Joe McCarthy was to the discipline of political science. However, in point of fact the question, whilst entirely misconstruing the nature of information and its instantiation, is a useful one to address broadly, so I’ll skip the start of the Dembski series for another day or so to look at it. Continue reading
Search
-
Recent Posts
- The psychology of materialism 27/08/2026
- Immense and eternal, not big and old 19/08/2026
- Cambridge professors and Evangelical beliefs 13/08/2026
- Dickens ex machina 07/08/2026
- Rehashing double causation 06/08/2026
Recent Comments
Post Archive
September 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
