Letting the air out of Genesis 1

Here’s the phenomenological treatment of the Genesis creation account I promised you, if you’re interested in the cosmology of the Bible. You’ll need to read my piece on “air” first to see where I’m coming from, but you might also want to take a look at a two-part scholarly article here and here  by Andrew Perry, of Durham University. Continue reading

Posted in Creation, Science, Theology | Leave a comment

A short history of air

Another BioLogos thread on the relationship of Genesis 1 to “modern science” got me thinking more about the phenomenology of that, and other ANE accounts like Enuma Elish. By this I mean to bypass, for now, the (more important) questions of “meaning” and “genre”, simply to try and get a better picture of what kind of world the ancients saw when they looked out of the window. It becomes quite interesting. Continue reading

Posted in Creation, History, Philosophy, Science | 4 Comments

On the resurrection…

… and on a good number of other matters too, from Creation to Scriptural Inspiration… Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy, Politics and sociology, Science, Theology | Leave a comment

When creation is not good enough

I found myself astonished by the sheer scale, and immediacy, of media outpouring over the death on Monday of David Bowie. I don’t know what it was like elsewhere in the world, but from the first “We heard half an hour ago…” on the non pop-culture BBC Radio 4, pretty well the whole radio output of the day seemed to be replaced by every available media person’s appreciations, however trivial. Here was the BBC news: “I’m sorry to have to cut short your thoughts on tomorrow’s national doctors’ strike, but you’ll appreciate that in the light of David Bowie’s death this specially extended programme…” Continue reading

Posted in Music, Politics and sociology, Theology, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

How hard can prevention be?

One of the more glorious moments of my not especially glorious medical career was that I was, quite accidentally, instrumental in catalyzing a medical conference on prostate cancer screening in our town. Here’s how it happened. Continue reading

Posted in Medicine, Politics and sociology, Science | 10 Comments

The rate- (or purpose-) limiting step of Creation

I was struck by a succinct observation by poster StephenB on an Uncommon Descent thread about theistic evolution:

For guided evolution, the design precedes the process. For Darwinian evolution, the process precedes the design (appearance of).

Continue reading

Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology | 7 Comments

Outsiders’ insights

I’ve in the past waxed enthusiastic about the BBC radio programme In Our Time, in which presenter Melvyn Bragg asks a specially assembled panel of (genuine) experts intelligent questions about some chosen topic, which might range from the Battle of Marathon to Alice in Wonderland, or from Genghiz Khan to Isambard Kingdom Brunel. Just before Christmas they did a good one on Michael Faraday. Continue reading

Posted in Creation, History, Politics and sociology, Science, Theology | 2 Comments

Climate change and Christian faith

My wife’s cousin, an academic historian, was staying over Christmas. We were watching the news, of which the first half was about the severe storms causing extensive flooding in northern England and southern Scotland, and the the second half about unprecedented snowfall and tornadoes sweeping the United States. Cousin suddenly remarked, “I think God’s trying to tell us something.” Continue reading

Posted in Creation, Science, Theology | Leave a comment

Arminius and natural providence

Back in 2012 I posted a piece about the views of the Dutch theologian Jacobus Arminius on creation. The start of my argument was that the still-prevalent semideistic “freedom of creation” teaching amongst theistic evolutionists is most logically taken as a projection of the Arminian teaching on human free-will. Continue reading

Posted in Creation, Science, Theology | Leave a comment

The Holly and the Ivy

DSCF5749Holly (this growing on our spread) – a most fallen plant by Genesis literalist standards, being both poisonous (like the ivy, in fact) and thorny. But it is undiminished, nevertheless, in its Christmas appeal and the allegorical lessons to be learned from the English folk carol first published in the early nineteenth century. And so it’s clearly an integral part of Christ’s good Creation. Have a good Christmas all – we’ll be back soon. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments