Search
-
Recent Posts
- Why Pentecostalism is the universal Evangelical acid 26/09/2025
- Doctor warns paracetamol causes Trump Derangement Syndrome 24/09/2025
- Tommy the terrorist 22/09/2025
- Surreality and Messianism 19/09/2025
- More on Comrade Musk 17/09/2025
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on Doctor warns paracetamol causes Trump Derangement Syndrome
- GD on Doctor warns paracetamol causes Trump Derangement Syndrome
- GD on Doctor warns paracetamol causes Trump Derangement Syndrome
- Peter Hickman on Doctor warns paracetamol causes Trump Derangement Syndrome
- Jon Garvey on Doctor warns paracetamol causes Trump Derangement Syndrome
Post Archive
Category Archives: Theology of nature
The tree in Berkeley’s square (no nightingale)
George Berkeley is most famous for his immaterialist view of reality, which is nicely, if incompletely, summed up in Monsignor Ronald Knox’s limerick:
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology, Theology of nature
6 Comments
Predictability, reproducibility and determinism in chaos
On a Peaceful Science thread I promised Chris Falter that I’d respond to his argument that chaotic systems are instrinsically indeterminate. The context, of course, as the thread title shows (Every Birth is a Statistical Impossibilty) has to do with the possibility of determination of events by God, as well as by us.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology, Theology of nature
Leave a comment
Abstraction and improbability
I’ve been dipping into George Berkeley’s philosophy recently, mainly because his mind-only view of reality resonates with some other thinkers whose ideas on the matter of matter have impressed me over the years, such as Arthur Eddington, Werner Heisenberg and William Dembski.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology, Theology of nature
1 Comment
Editing history
Back in early September 2017 I was writing a Hump pieceĀ on Aquinas and the special creation of humanity. Providentially I stumbled on a YouTube video posted just the week before in which Tim Keller, Russell Moore and Ligon Duncan discuss their “non-negotiables” on creation.
Posted in Creation, Genealogical Adam, Science, Theology of nature
13 Comments
Divine action – smoke, mirrors, or sublety?
1 Kings 11-12 tell the story of one of the most significant events in the history of the kingdom of Israel – that is, the defection of all the northern tribes from King David’s dynasty thus breaking up the chosen people into two kingdoms. Northern Israel quickly lapsed into apostasy and was destroyed by the Assyrians, essentially disappearing from history.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology, Theology of nature
Leave a comment
Molinism again
A quick thought here, based on a heads-up to me on Peaceful Science on a thread that, for some reason, doesn’t give me the ability to reply. No matter, because I have more space to reply here.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology of nature
4 Comments
Nasty pests
The environmental message of God’s Good Earth is, in my own eyes, rather muted. Conservation was, after all, a subsidiary theme of the book, though I was pleased that Sir Ghillean Prance, in his endorsement, saw it as a demand for positive action.
On distinguishing miracles from providence
In my recent piece about Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis, I mentioned how Bacon, supposedly the staunch supporter of methodological naturalism, included both a scientificcally detectable miracle and a providential answer to prayer in an apologetic for the new science that is only 22 pages long. He would appear to cut the world-cake rather differently from many of a scientific bent now, who divide the world sharply between the “natural” and the “miraculous.”
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Theology of nature
Leave a comment
The Language of God
No, sorry Francis Collins, not that one. Nor Galileo’s mathematics. I’m referring to the whole science-faith interface, and more.
Posted in Creation, Science, Theology of nature
Leave a comment
Design and all that metaphysics
A thread at Peaceful Science tosses around the usual argument-suspects about Intelligent Design. It was set up in an unhelpful way by the common ID argument contrasting Mount Rushmore (a large statue in America, m’Lud, in the form of a carved mountain) with Mount Everest, a “natural” mountain.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology of nature
Leave a comment