Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ideology as brain surgery 06/06/2026
- What turns Evangelicals Catholic? 03/06/2026
- British values were Evangelical Christian values 30/05/2026
- Donald Campbell and Darwinian theory 28/05/2026
- Speech suppression more contagious than COVID – and certainly deadlier 26/05/2026
Recent Comments
- Jon Garvey on Does matter matter?
- Ben on Does matter matter?
- Jon Garvey on Ideology as brain surgery
- Peter Hickman on Ideology as brain surgery
- Jon Garvey on Does matter matter?
Post Archive
Author Archives: Jon Garvey
Sorry – not even a Pope can do that
Pope Francis has reportedly endorsed the opinion of “Vatican experts” in revising the Italian wording of the Lord’s Prayer so that it reads (in English translation, of course!) “Do not let us fall/be abandoned into temptation.”
Posted in Theology
4 Comments
Response to Nick Townsend on WHO post
Yesterday I posted a piece on a news report about the World Health Organisation’s recategoration of “gender identity disorder” as “gender incongruence,” and was taken to task by a new commenter, Nick Townsend. I’ve decided I can give a more adequate response to his well-argued post in a new OP rather than in the limited format of the comments software.
Posted in Creation, Politics and sociology, Science
5 Comments
What if it were NASA that said the Earth is flat?
My pastor drew my attention to this BBC article last week. I’m not entirely sure how much this is new news, and how much old news repackaged, in that I have been aware that “gender identity disorder” has been rebranded in various national indices of medical disorders as a “gender dysphoria.” The “news” seems to be the ratification of this by the “World Health Assembly” last week, so it will appear in ICD-11, the international gold standard of diagnostic categores, as “gender incongruence, a marked and persistent incongruence between a person’s experienced gender and assigned sex.”
Posted in Creation, Politics and sociology, Science
4 Comments
Where the bee doesn’t suck…
Longstanding (and longsuffering) readers may remember that I often like to delve in the story of any interesting new species I come across, and I virtually always find that they are exceptions to the evolutionary rules. The most recent is this handsome plant that has appeared, apparently for the first time, in my ongoing wildflower meadow project.
Posted in Creation, Science
Leave a comment
Extinction Miscalculation
The recent press story of mass global warming extinctions came from a policy summary published well in advance of the scientific survey on which it is said to be based (so that governments get their policies in place before being distracted by complicated science?). But the core of it was based on the IUCN Red List of endangered and recently extinct (vertebrate) species, of which a graph was included on a century by century scale, indeed showing a dramatic escalation from the 16th century.
Posted in Creation, Politics and sociology, Science
1 Comment
The Emperor has no clothes
The Independent, 28th May __19 Anti-democrat’s tweet condemned There was widespread outrage on social media yesterday following a tweet by a formerly unknown costume-denialist, Wat Simkin, claiming that, at the morning royal parade, the Emperor “hadn’t got anything on.”
Posted in Uncategorized
3 Comments
Here comes the sun – and fuel poverty
So the EU election results show, more or less as predicted, an increasing polarisation between broadly globalist and broadly nationalist people. As in the USA, this trend is worrying for long-term civil peace, but is probably inevitable because their respective visions for society are, truly, incompatible.
Posted in Creation, Politics and sociology
3 Comments
Nobel Prize pseudoscience v Classics orthodoxy
Returning to my long thread on science in the media over at Peaceful Science, at one stage the accusations of irrational climate denialism were expressed, by a classics graduate, no less, thus: This is the language of the science denialist. Which anti-science cause will you champion next, chiropractic and homeopathy?
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Politics and sociology, Science
9 Comments
Welcome back M. Macron
I had reason to comment on the number of apparent French vistors The Hump was receiving, back in March. I invited any French readers to comment here, but it soon became clear why none ever did.
Posted in Politics and sociology
3 Comments
Models of probity
There is still no substantive response to the evidence I gave at Peaceful Science for the misrepresentation of walrus deaths in a David Attenborough film. But “T_aquaticus” has taken it upon himself to apply the “climate denialist” insinuations of people on the thread (I have not denied climate change there), and to sigh, in that exasperated tone that scientistic types always use when they think they’re dealing with people who read as little as they do. He writes: “I’m guessing that no amount of information is going to budge you?”
Posted in Politics and sociology, Science
2 Comments