Search
-
Recent Posts
- Cambridge professors and Evangelical beliefs 13/08/2026
- Dickens ex machina 07/08/2026
- Rehashing double causation 06/08/2026
- The extended God hypothesis 01/08/2026
- The lab-leak is slowly leaking out 26/07/2026
Recent Comments
Post Archive
Category Archives: Philosophy
Methodological theology, naturally
There’s an interesting new series of YouTube videos (of which I confess to having heard only two so far) of a conference discussing alternatives to methodological naturalism. The organiser is, of course, an ID group – which is hardly surprising, as according to most mainstream scientists MN is just fine and dandy. What you don’t doubt, you don’t examine that carefully. But as I’ve been suggesting here and here there is at least an argument for its being a hindrance not only to the consideration of God’s role in nature, but also to some aspects of understanding nature itself.
Posted in Creation, History, Philosophy, Science, Theology
35 Comments
The danger of dualism in theistic evolution
I’m continuing the theme here, from the last two posts, that origin of life questions may require not just new knowledge, but a new scientific paradigm – perhaps one that integrally includes God. This is counterintuitive to many Christians most involved in science, and who are comfortable with methodological naturalism as the only alternative to a crude supernaturalism. But I’ll try to justify it from a remark made to me by Joshua Swamidass on BioLogos.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology
17 Comments
“Underdetermination”, diversity and truth
In a recent debate between proponents of Open Theism and Classical Theism, much was made of the suggestion that Scripture “underdetermines” the matters in question. This suggestion was made, apparently irenically, by moderators of the debate but also, less intuitively, given their claim to be more Scriptural, by some on the “openness” side. This would appear to be because they are currently perceived as the “fringe” (although within academia there are grounds for saying that the “voluntary-kenotic-perichoretic-relational-panentheist paradigm” is the new orthodoxy – see this blog re academic theology overall and this essay on the same trend in Evangelicalism), and can gain a better foothold by the strategy of saying, … Continue reading
Posted in Philosophy, Theology
2 Comments
You see more on a camel
As regular readers will know either from moonlighting on Biologos, or from the heads up in the comments on a previous post, BioLogos moderator Caspar Hess started a thread there questioning why The Hump should both feel the need, and dare, to exist. The way that thread has developed is the answer, as far as I am concerned, and explains why I don’t bother to discuss much there now, even on a thread about me.
Posted in Philosophy, Politics and sociology
9 Comments
God’s Good Earth – Chapter 9: On Pain and Suffering
Here is a link to chapter 9 of my book.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science
11 Comments
God’s Good Earth – Chapter 8: The Non-Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
Here is a link to chapter 8 of my book, and an apology.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology
Leave a comment
On God’s uniqueness
I’ve been trying to keep The Hump’s recent blog posts focused on the drip-feed of my book God’s Good Earth in twice weekly chapters – even that is a lot of reading for busy people, and I want to present my case in an orderly manner rather than firing off posts on all kinds of subjects in between.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Theology
Leave a comment
God’s Good Earth – Chapter 6: Tracking the Fall of Creation
Here is a link to chapter 6 of my book.
Posted in Creation, History, Philosophy, Prometheus, Theology
6 Comments
Monotheism and automata
In my last post I suggested that failure to deal adequately with the implications of monotheism itself leads directly to many erroneous ideas in both theology as such and in understanding the relationship of God to creation, including evolution.
Posted in Creation, Philosophy, Science, Theology
65 Comments
A metaphor for an abstraction
Mike Flynn (aka The O’Floinn) links to a short piece from last year by James Chastek pointing out how even Richard Dawkins, championing materialism in the “selfish gene” concept, cannot avoid the hated idea of final causation. Food for thought, indeed.
Posted in Philosophy, Science
Leave a comment